4.8 Article

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation less predictable under greenhouse warming

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 30-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0663-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41490640, 41490643]
  2. CSHOR
  3. Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub of the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program
  4. NSFC [41976005, 41606008, 41922039, 91858102]
  5. National Key R&D Programme of China [2016YFA0601803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is the most prominent form of decadal variability over the North Pacific, characterized by its horseshoe-shaped sea surface temperature anomaly pattern(1,2). The PDO exerts a substantial influence on marine ecosystems, fisheries and agriculture(1-3). Through modulating global mean temperature, the phase shift of the PDO at the end of the twentieth century is suggested to be an influential factor in the recent surface warming hiatus(4,5). Determining the predictability of the PDO in a warming climate is therefore of great importance(6). By analysing future climate under different emission scenarios simulated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (ref. (7)), we show that the prediction lead time and the associated amplitude of the PDO decrease sharply under greenhouse warming conditions. This decrease is largely attributable to a warming-induced intensification of oceanic stratification, which accelerates the propagation of Rossby waves, shortening the PDO lifespan and suppressing its amplitude by limiting its growth time. Our results suggest that greenhouse warming will make prediction of the PDO more challenging, with far-reaching ramifications. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), a natural climate cycle, alters global climate and influences ecosystems as it varies between positive and negative phases. PDO predictability is reduced under warming as intensified ocean stratification shortens its lifespan and curtails its amplitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据