4.7 Review

Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin

期刊

DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 285-296

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S237393

关键词

ivermectin; cancer; molecular mechanisms; antitumour effects; drug therapy

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, China (CN) [20190101014JH, 20170622008JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin (AVM), was introduced into the veterinary, agricultural and aquaculture markets for animal health in 1981. Ivermectin was soon adopted in 1987 as a human medicine that was originally used for the treatment of onchocerciasis, a parasitic infection. Since then, ivermectin has also been used to control other human diseases and has exerted a significant effect on human health and welfare. In the past decade, many published studies have attempted to determine the role of ivermectin in cancer. In this review, we summarize the published studies to define the current progress in the characterization of ivermectin. Ivermectin causes cell death in cancer cell lines by inducing PAK1-mediated cytostatic autophagy, caspase-dependent apoptosis and immunogenic cell death (ICD) through the modulation of some pathways, including the WNT-T cell factor (TCF), Hippo and Akt/mTOR pathways. Ivermectin can affect the growth and proliferation of cancer cells and plays several different roles, such as its functions as an RNA helicase, a small-molecule mimetic of the surface-induced dissociation (SID) peptide, an activator of chloride channel receptors, and an inducer of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. In addition, ivermectin induces the multidrug resistance protein (MDR), has potent anti-mitotic activity, targets angiogenesis and inhibits cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). Many studies have proven that ivermectin exerts antitumour effects and might thus benefit patients with cancer after sufficient clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据