4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Untangling systematics of the Paramacrobiotus areolatus species complex by an integrative redescription of the nominal species for the group, with multilocus phylogeny and species delineation in the genus Paramacrobiotus

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 188, 期 3, 页码 694-716

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz163

关键词

Arctic; biological species concept; integrative taxonomy; interbreeding; Paramacrobiotus crenatus syn. nov.; species delineation; Svalbard

类别

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [2016/22/E/NZ8/00417]
  2. Jagiellonian University [DS/MND/WBiNoZ/IZ/29/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incomplete descriptions of nominal taxa are one of the most significant obstacles in modern taxonomy, including the taxonomy of Tardigrada. Another major problem in tardigrade systematics is the lack of tests for the reliability of genetic markers in species delineation. Here, we employ an integrative taxonomy approach to redescribe the nominal taxon for the P. areolatus complex, Paramacrobiotus areolatus. Moreover, we obtained multilocus DNA sequences for another 16 populations representing 9-12 Paramacrobiotus species collected from Europe, North America, Africa and Australia, enabling us to reconstruct the most extensive phylogeny of the genus to date. The identification of a pair of potentially cryptic dioecious P. areolatus complex species with divergent genetic distances in ITS2 (1.4%) and COI (13.8%) provided an opportunity to test the biological species concept for the first time in the history of tardigrade taxonomy. Intra- and interpopulation crosses did not differ in reproductive success in terms of F 1 offspring. However, because of the low F 1 family sizes, we were unfortunately unable to test F 1 hybrid fertility. Although our results are only partially conclusive, they offer a baseline not only for further taxonomic and phylogenetic research on the areolatus complex, but also for studies on species delineation in tardigrades in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据