4.7 Article

Hydrodynamic cavitation degradation of Rhodamine B assisted by Fe3+ - doped TiO2: Mechanisms, geometric and operation parameters

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104806

关键词

Hydrodynamic cavitation; Venturi tube design; Fe3+-doped TiO2; Degradation of organic dye; Box-Behnken design

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41977205, 31570154]
  2. Major science and technology project of Water Pollution Control and Management in China [2015ZX07202-012]
  3. Liaoning Province Xingliao Talent Program project [XLYC1802070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel method, hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) combined with Fe3+-doped TiO2, for the degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solution is reported. The venturi tubes with different geometric parameters (size, shape and half divergent angle) are designed to obtain a strong HC effect. The structure, morphology and chemical composition of prepared Fe3+-doped TiO2 as catalyst are characterized via using XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, UV-vis DRS and PL methods. The effects of added TiO2 (heat-treated at different temperatures for different times) and Fe3+-doped TiO2 (with different mole ratios of Fe and Ti) on the HC catalytic degradation of RhB are discussed. The influences of operation parameters including inlet pressure, initial RhB concentration and operating temperature on the HC catalytic degradation of RhB are studied by Box-Behnken design (BBD) and response surface methodology (RSM). Under 3.0 bar inlet pressure for 10 mg/L initial concentration of RhB solution at 40 degrees C operating temperature in the presence of Fe3+-doped TiO2 with 0.05:1.00 M ratio of Fe and Ti, the best HC degradation ratio can be obtained (91.11%). Furthermore, a possible mechanism of HC degradation of organic pollutants in the presence of Fe3+-doped TiO2 is proposed. Perhaps, this study may provide a feasible method for a large-scale treatment of dye wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据