4.2 Article

Toward a point-of-care diagnostic for specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum samples

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101919

关键词

Biosensor; L-arginine; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Tuberculosis; Point-of-care diagnostic

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Laboratorio de Imunopatologia Keizo Asami - (LIKA)
  4. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
  5. Centro de Pesquisas Instituto Aggeu Magalhaes (IAM)
  6. Laboratorio Central de Saude Publica de Pernambuco (LACEN/PE, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the development of a new PCR-free device, using IS6110 gene as biomarker, for Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. An arginine film (ARGFILM) was used to prepare the biosensor platform. MT-probe was immobilized on this biosensor platform to identify IS6110 gene. This gene is an excellent biomarker for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT). Electrochemical analyses were carried out using differential pulse voltammetry method (DPV) by methylene blue (MB) reduction signal measurement before and after hybridization either between probe and synthetic target or extracted DNA from clinical sputum samples. The optimization study of MT-probe immobilization on modified-electrode surface showed that the best probe concentration was 15 mu M. The analytical analysis of hybridization assays was performed using different concentrations of synthetic MT-target (15-500 nM). The linear response was between 15 and 100 nM and the detection limit was 4.4 nM. The biosensor performance was also investigated with extracted DNA from sputum samples (PCR-free). The results showed that the biosensor was able to detect the MT from samples, exhibiting a high sensitivity and satisfactory selectivity. Thus, these results allow for the possibility of developing a portable detection device for effective diagnosis of TB patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据