4.6 Article

Novel circovirus species identified in farmed pigs designated as Porcine circovirus 4, Hunan province, China

期刊

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 1057-1061

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13446

关键词

novel species; PCV4; pig; porcine circovirus; porcine circovirus 4

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0500104]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2017JJ2043]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Control of Infectious Diseases [BBS/E/D/20002173, BBS/E/D/20002174]
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20002173, BBS/E/D/20241865, BBS/E/D/20002174, BBS/E/D/20241864] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pigs, three circovirus species within the genus Circovirus have been identified so far, including the non-pathogenic Porcine circovirus 1 (PCV1), the pathogenic Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and the recently identified Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3). In April 2019, a new circovirus with a distinct relationship to other circoviruses was identified in several pigs with severe clinical disease in Hunan province, China. The size of the viral genome, tentatively designated as porcine circovirus type 4 (PCV4), is 1,770 nucleotides (nt). PCV4 shows the highest genomic identity to mink circovirus (66.9%) and has identities of 43.2%-51.5% to the other PCV genomes. Two major genes, a replicase (Rep) gene spanning 891 nt and a capsid (Cap) gene spanning 687 nt, were predicted. Furthermore, a TaqMan (R) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the replicase gene was developed to investigate the prevalence of PCV4 in 187 clinical samples from Hunan province, China. The results revealed an overall PCV4 prevalence of 12.8%, with the highest positive rates in nasal swabs (28.5%, 6/21) followed by serum samples (13.4%, 11/82). The clinical significance and pathogenesis of this virus needs further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据