4.6 Review

A circuit perspective on narcolepsy

期刊

SLEEP
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsz296

关键词

narcolepsy; cataplexy; hypocretins/orexins; neural circuits

资金

  1. University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital
  2. Human Frontier Science Program [RGY0076/2012]
  3. Inselspital University Hospital Bern
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_156156]
  5. European Research Council [725850]
  6. University of Bern
  7. National Institutes of Health [DK105510]
  8. National Science Foundation [1652060]
  9. CNRS
  10. NIH [R01 NS106032]
  11. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  12. Merck
  13. University of Bern, Bern University Hospital (Inselspital), Insel grant [84801184]
  14. Sleep Medicine Research Foundation
  15. Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute
  16. Sinergia [CRSII3_160803]
  17. WakeUpNarcolepsy
  18. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_156156] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  19. Direct For Biological Sciences
  20. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1652060] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  21. European Research Council (ERC) [725850] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sleep disorder narcolepsy is associated with symptoms related to either boundary state control that include excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep fragmentation, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep features including cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hallucinations, and sleep-onset REM sleep events (SOREMs). Although the loss of Hypocretin/Orexin (Hcrt/Ox) peptides or their receptors have been associated with the disease, here we propose a circuit perspective of the pathophysiological mechanisms of these narcolepsy symptoms that encompasses brain regions, neuronal circuits, cell types, and transmitters beyond the Hcrt/Ox system. We further discuss future experimental strategies to investigate brain-wide mechanisms of narcolepsy that will be essential for a better understanding and treatment of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据