4.6 Article

Perinatal antecedents of sleep disturbances in schoolchildren

期刊

SLEEP
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa021

关键词

preterm; prematurity; newborn; insomnia; snoring; apnea

资金

  1. FONDECYT project [1180397, 1160836]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL130984, HL140548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: Prematurity has been associated with an increased risk for sleep apnea. However, sleep disturbances in children born preterm have not been extensively investigated. Considering that determinants of sleep may originate early in life, the potential impact of prematurity on sleep disturbances later in life could be important. To establish the role of prematurity on sleep disturbances in a cohort of schoolchildren that were born preterm and compare them with healthy controls. Methods: A cohort of 147 schoolchildren, 45 born at term (>= 37 weeks) and 102 very preterm (<32 weeks), was recruited and evaluated at school age (5-9 years). The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) were used to assess sleep disturbances in different domains. Results: PSQ score was significantly higher in former preterm children (0.26 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.18 +/- 0.14 in controls; p = 0.004), and SDSC total score was also significantly different among groups (21.7 +/- 11.6 vs. 14.1 +/- 12.6; p < 0.001). Regression models showed significant mean differences in PSQ score, total SDSC score, and two SDSC subscale scores (i.e. sleep-wake transition disorders, sleep-breathing disorders, and sleep hyperhidrosis) even after adjustment for confounders. Maternal age and type of delivery were not significantly associated with total PSQ scores. Conclusions: Sleep disturbances may originate early in life since children born preterm exhibit an increased risk for developing long-term sleep problems. These findings may have important implications for management of preterm children and for implementation of early interventions focused on optimizing sleep habits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据