标题
A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
作者
关键词
-
出版物
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2020-02-22
DOI
10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Funding information in Web of Science: an updated overview
- (2020) Weishu Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The secrets behind Web of Science’s DOI search
- (2019) Junwen Zhu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough
- (2019) Weishu Liu SCIENTOMETRICS
- Bibliometric analysis of fuzzy theory research in China: A 30-year perspective
- (2018) Dejian Yu et al. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
- Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science
- (2018) Henk F. Moed et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The scientometric portrait of Eugene Garfield through the free ResearcherID service from the Web of Science Core Collection of 67 million master records and 1.3 billion references
- (2018) Peter Jacso SCIENTOMETRICS
- The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects
- (2018) Ole Ellegaard SCIENTOMETRICS
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Missing author address information in Web of Science—An explorative study
- (2018) Weishu Liu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers
- (2018) Zhigang Hu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science
- (2018) Junwen Zhu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
- (2018) Alberto Martín-Martín et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis
- (2017) Kai Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Use of locality sensitive hashing (LSH) algorithm to match Web of Science and Scopus
- (2017) Mehmet Ali Abdulhayoglu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Publish or impoverish
- (2017) Wei Quan et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics
- (2016) Weishu Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus
- (2016) Qi Wang et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
- (2015) Anne-Wil Harzing et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
- (2015) Philippe Mongeon et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account
- (2015) Lin Zhang et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation Increases?
- (2015) Li Tang et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013)
- (2015) Weishu Liu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Feature report on China: a bibliometric analysis of China-related articles
- (2014) Weishu Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study
- (2012) Georgina Guilera et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories
- (2012) Loet Leydesdorff et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics
- (2011) Li Tang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databasesâScopus and Web of Science
- (2009) Lokman I. Meho et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started