4.7 Article

Efficient removal of oxytetracycline from aqueous solution using magnetic montmorillonite-biochar composite prepared by one step pyrolysis

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 695, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133800

关键词

Oxytetracycline; Removal mechanisms; Adsorption; Magnetic montmorillonite-biochar; Reusable composites

资金

  1. Gansu Natural Science Fund, China [17JR5RA218]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1903703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three adsorbents, namely, original biochar (CLB), montmorillonite (MMT)-biochar composite (MBC), and magnetic MMT-biochar composite (MMBC) were successfully fabricated by one step pyrolysis of original cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) leaves, mixture of cauliflower leaves and MMT, and FeCl3-laden mixture of cauliflower leaves and MMT under limited oxygen atmosphere, respectively. The characterizations of samples indicated that substantial MMT mineral particles and Fe3O4 nanoparticle were dispersed on the surface of MMBC. Due to the introduction of Fe3O4, MMBC performed excellent magnetization property. The adsorption experiments of oxytetracycline (OTC) indicated that the maximum adsorption ability of MMBC was 58.85 mg.g(-1), which was 2.63 times as large as CLB, also, larger than that of MBC. Meanwhile, pH, ionic strength, and humic acid (HA) performed slight effects for adsorption of OTC on MMBC. In addition, MMBC still removed 92%, OTC after five regeneration cycles. Finally, primary mechanisms of OTC adsorption onto MMBC were attributed to hydrogen bonding and pi-pi reaction, and ion exchange reaction was considered to exist. Meanwhile, functional groups including Si-O-AL Si-O-Si, Si-O, and Fe3O4 nanoparticles would provide extra binding sites for OTC adsorption. Therefore, MMBC had an obvious potential to apply into water purification as a reliable, low-cost, and environmentally friendly adsorbent. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据