4.4 Article

Exploring low-magnification dental microwear of domestic ungulates: Qualitative observations to infer palaeodiets

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 557, 期 -, 页码 12-22

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.02.021

关键词

Caprine palaeodiet; Experimentation; Iron age; Southern France; La ramasse; Lattara

资金

  1. Investissement d'Avenir program of the LabEx ARCHIMEDE, University Paul-Valery 3 Montpellier, France [ANR-11-LABX-0032-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-Magnification Dental Microwear Analysis (LMDA) has been widely applied to reconstruct the palaeodiet of wild ungulates. Quantitative observations of the microscopic scratches and pits on the surfaces of the dental enamel of these species allow to distinguish different diets. LMDA has more recently also served to shed light on the palaeodiets of domestic ungulates such as caprines. This technique, however, has not been widely applied to domestic ungulates from extant and archaeological material. In fact, the findings of a recent experimental study indicate that the quantification of pits and scratches affecting the dental enamel of two groups of ewes do not allow to discriminate between feeding in rangeland and grassland areas. The current study therefore explores the potential of a number of different qualitative observations (e.g. presence/absence of surface damage or furrows) to identify the diet of the aforementioned group of ewes. Despite the fact that the results are prone to intraobserver error, they nonetheless indicate that certain variables can serve to discern palaeodiets. The model gleaned from the extant ewes was then applied to archaeological material of caprines from La Ramasse and Lattara, two Iron Age sites in southeastern France. The preliminary results indicate disparities of the type of dental microwear of caprines from one site to another, differences that could derive from different feeding patterns stemming from dissimilar environmental conditions or different strategies employed by herders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据