4.2 Article

Genetic variation in plasticity of life-history traits between Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) populations exposed to contrasting thermal regimes

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 257-264

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2015-0186

关键词

Atlantic cod; climate change; early life-history traits; Gadus morhua; local adaptation; marine fish larvae; phenotypic plasticity; thermal reaction norm

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Loblaw Companies Limited
  3. Canadian Wildlife Federation
  4. Sushi Nami Royale
  5. Phi Kappa Pi Joe Ghiz Memorial Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employed common-garden experiments to test for genetic variation in responses of larval life-history traits to temperature between two populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L., 1758) that naturally experience contrasting thermal environments during early life due to spatial and temporal differences in spawning. Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence cod larvae experienced faster growth in warmer water and low, uniform survival across all experimental temperatures (3, 7, 11 degrees C), consistent with previous studies on this spring-spawning population. In contrast, larvae from fall-spawning Southwestern Scotian Shelf cod collected near Sambro, Nova Scotia, lacked plasticity for growth but experienced much lower survival at higher temperatures. Phenotypes that are positively associated with fitness were observed at temperatures closest to those experienced in the wild, consistent with the hypothesis that these populations are adapted to local thermal regimes. The lack of growth plasticity observed in Sambro cod might be due to costly maintenance of plasticity in stable environments or energy savings at cold temperatures. However, additional experiments need to be conducted on Sambro cod and other fall-spawning marine fishes to determine to what extent responses to projected changes in climate will differ among populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据