4.2 Article

Regional patterns of habitat use by a threatened forest bird, the Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli), in Quebec

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 301-309

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2015-0209

关键词

Bicknell's Thrush; Catharus bicknelli; breeding habitat use; abundance; habitat model; precommercial thinning; Swainson's Thrush; Catharus ustulatus

类别

资金

  1. Foret habitee du mont Gosford
  2. Municipality of Woburn
  3. Association Louise-Gosford
  4. Sentiers frontaliers
  5. Fondation de la faune du Quebec
  6. Environment Canada - Canadian Wildlife Service
  7. World Wildlife Fund
  8. Ministere des ressources naturelles du Quebec (volet II)
  9. Federation quebecoise des gestionnaires de zecs
  10. Emploi-Quebec
  11. College de Sherbrooke
  12. EJLB Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation of threatened species often uses habitat models to inform management of habitat and populations. We examined habitat use by Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli (Ridgway, 1882)), a federally Threatened species, in two Appalachian regions, shaped by forestry activities, of southern Quebec. Within its breeding range, the species inhabits mountain tops and forests subjected to various logging activities. We assessed the role of vegetation and topography at two spatial scales, as well as spatial relationships with Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus (Nuttall, 1840)), identified as a potential competitor by some authors. In both regions, Bicknell's Thrushes were most likely to be reported at high elevations, in forest stands with high tree stem densities that underwent little or no stem reduction from forestry activities. Swainson's Thrushes were present at all sites were Bicknell's Thrushes were reported. These results are consistent with findings from studies in northeastern parts of its breeding range. We conclude that forest-stand thinning should be kept to a minimum throughout the high-elevation nesting habitat of Bicknell's Thrush.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据