4.7 Article

Synergistic effects of expandable graphite and ammonium pentaborate octahydrate on the flame-retardant, thermal insulation, and mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 1749-1762

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.25494

关键词

ammonium pentaborate octahydrate; expandable graphite; rigid polyurethane foam composite; synergistic effect

资金

  1. Eskisehir Technical University Scientific Research Projects Commission [1606F56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of flame retardants (FRs) to improve the flame retardancy but also having good insulation and mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam (RPUF) has become significant due to the increasing demand in both the industry and academia. In the present study, a series of RPUF composites containing expandable graphite (EG), ammonium pentaborate (APB) octahydrate, and their binary blends were prepared with one-shot and free-rise methods. The effects of FRs on the FR and physical-mechanical properties of RPUFs were investigated. The results show that both EG and APB could improve the flame retardancy of RPUFs and reduced the smoke production. The FR effect of EG was better than APB and more importantly, synergistic effect was found between EG and APB. The best results were obtained by the foam in the composition of 15E and 5A. The cone calorimeter test results showed that the peak heat release rate (pHRR) and total smoke release (THR) of 15E/5A foam were lower than the foams of 20E and 20A. The pHRR and THR values of 15E/5A foam decreased about 57.5% and 42.8% compared to the neat RPUF, respectively. Total smoke production (m(2)) also reduced about 77.0% by 20E and 83.6% by 15E/5A foams. Thermogravimetric analysis indicates that the char residue of 15E/5A foam increased to 39.5%, which provided better flame retardancy. The foam composites have high compressive strength (105-150 kPa) and low thermal conductivity values (19.9-21.3 mW/mK). While the thermal conductivity of 15E/5A foam increased by 0.5%, its compressive strength increased by 6.1%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据