4.7 Article

Carbonic anhydrases CA1 and CA4 function in atmospheric CO2-modulated disease resistance

期刊

PLANTA
卷 251, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-020-03370-w

关键词

Arabidopsis; CO2 metabolism; Defense signaling; Plant immunity; Pseudomonas syringae

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. VIDI Grant of Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/STW) [11281]
  3. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization [ALTF 657-2013]
  5. European Research Council [269072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Main conclusion Carbonic anhydrases CA1 and CA4 attenuate plant immunity and can contribute to altered disease resistance levels in response to changing atmospheric CO2 conditions. beta-Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) play an important role in CO2 metabolism and plant development, but have also been implicated in plant immunity. Here we show that the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and application of the microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) flg22 repress CA1 and CA4 gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Using the CA double-mutant ca1ca4, we provide evidence that CA1 and CA4 play an attenuating role in pathogen- and flg22-triggered immune responses. In line with this, ca1ca4 plants exhibited enhanced resistance against P. syringae, which was accompanied by an increased expression of the defense-related genes FRK1 and ICS1. Under low atmospheric CO2 conditions (150 ppm), when CA activity is typically low, the levels of CA1 transcription and resistance to P. syringae in wild-type Col-0 were similar to those observed in ca1ca4. However, under ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (800 ppm) atmospheric CO2 conditions, CA1 transcription was enhanced and resistance to P. syringae reduced. Together, these results suggest that CA1 and CA4 attenuate plant immunity and that differential CA gene expression in response to changing atmospheric CO2 conditions contribute to altered disease resistance levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据