4.2 Article

The Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI)

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 196-202

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2016.415

关键词

Neurodegeneration; Dementia; Alzheimer's; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Frontotemporal Dementia; Parkinson Disease; vascular cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Ontario Brain Institute through the Government of Ontario
  2. Baycrest Foundation
  3. Bruyere Research Institute
  4. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
  5. London Health Sciences Foundation
  6. McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences
  7. Ottawa Brain and Mind Research Institute
  8. Queen's University Faculty of Health Sciences
  9. Providence Care (Kingston)
  10. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Foundation
  11. Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
  12. University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine
  13. Windsor/Essex County ALS Association
  14. Temerty Family Foundation
  15. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship
  16. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  17. L.C. Campbell Research Chair
  18. Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because individuals develop dementia as a manifestation of neurodegenerative or neurovascular disorder, there is a need to develop reliable approaches to their identification. We are undertaking an observational study (Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative [ONDRI]) that includes genomics, neuroimaging, and assessments of cognition as well as language, speech, gait, retinal imaging, and eye tracking. Disorders studied include Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and vascular cognitive impairment. Data from ONDRI will be collected into the Brain-CODE database to facilitate correlative analysis. ONDRI will provide a repertoire of endophenotyped individuals that will be a unique, publicly available resource.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据