4.8 Article

Same fold, different properties: polarizable molecular dynamics simulations of telomeric and TERRA G-quadruplexes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 561-575

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1154

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35GM133754]
  2. Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust (Bank of America, Trustee), USDA-NIFA [VA-160092]
  3. Virginia Tech Office of the Provost, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Department of Biochemistry
  4. NIGMS [R35GM133754]
  5. Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA and RNA sequences rich in guanine can fold into noncanonical structures called G-quadruplexes (GQs), which exhibit a common stem structure of Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonded guanine tetrads and diverse loop structures. GQ sequence motifs are overrepresented in promoters, origins of replication, telomeres, and untranslated regions in mRNA, suggesting roles in modulating gene expression and preserving genomic integrity. Given these roles and unique aspects of different structures, GQs are attractive targets for drug design, but greater insight into GQ folding pathways and the interactions stabilizing them is required. Here, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to study two bimolecular GQs, a telomeric DNA GQ and the analogous telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) GQ. We applied the Drude polarizable force field, which we show outperforms the additive CHARMM36 force field in both ion retention and maintenance of the GQ folds. The polarizable simulations reveal that the GQs bind bulk K+ ions differently, and that the TERRA GQ accumulates more K+ ions, suggesting different ion interactions stabilize these structures. Nucleobase dipole moments vary as a function of position and also contribute to ion binding. Finally, we show that the TERRA GQ is more sensitive than the telomeric DNA GQ to water-mediated modulation of ion-induced dipole-dipole interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据