4.4 Article

Micro-syngas technology options for GtL

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 613-622

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22433

关键词

steam methane reforming; Catalytic partial oxidation; auto-thermal reforming; Fischer-Tropsch; optimization

资金

  1. ME Resource Corp.
  2. NSERC
  3. Banting Post-Doctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural gas emissions contribute to climate change, and equally importantly, affect the health of populations near gas fields.([1]) At night, the flares from the Bakken fields in North Dakota burn as bright as the lights in cities as large as Minneapolis. Rather than flaring (or worse, venting), this associated natural gas represents a multi-billion dollar opportunity.([2]) Pipelines and liquefying natural gas are cost prohibitive in many cases. Converting methane to fuels is an attractive alternative. We examined three options to convert natural gas to syngas (H2 and CO), which is the first step to producing fuels: Steam Methane Reforming (SMR), Auto-Thermal Reforming (ATR), and Catalytic Partial Oxidation (CPOX). Based on a multi-objective optimization analysis, C5+ hydrocarbon yields are highest with CPOX as the first step followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FT). A micro-refinery with the CPOX-FT process treating 2800kLd-1 (100 MCFd-1) natural gas, produces 1300 Ld-1 (8.2 bbld-1) of C5+ hydrocarbons. Maximum yields for the SMR-FT and ATR-FT processes are 938 Ld-1 and 1100 Ld-1 (5.9 bbld-1, 7.0 bbld-1) of C5+, respectively. Large-scale POX and ATR processes produce 1600 L per 2800 kL (10 bbl per 100 MCF) of natural gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据