4.6 Article

A cationic amphiphilic co-polymer as a carrier of nucleic acid nanoparticles (Nanps) for controlled gene silencing, immunostimulation, and biodistribution

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102094

关键词

nucleic acid nanoparticles; immunology; RNA interference; drug delivery

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM120487]
  2. NSF-REU
  3. DOD-ASSURE under NSF [CHE 1460867]
  4. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes (NINDS) of the NIH [1R01 NS111037-01]
  6. NIGMS of the NIH [5P20GM103444-07]
  7. South Carolina -Spinal Cord Injury Research Fund (SC-SCIRF) [SCIRF 2017 B-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Programmable nucleic acid nanoparticles (NANPs) provide controlled coordination of therapeutic nucleic acids (TNAs) and other biological functionalities. Beyond multivalence, recent reports demonstrate that NANP technology can also elicit a specific immune response, adding another layer of customizability to this innovative approach. While the delivery of nucleic acids remains a challenge, new carriers are introduced and tested continuously. Polymeric platforms have proven to be efficient in shielding nucleic acid cargos from nuclease degradation while promoting their delivery and intracellular release. Here, we venture beyond the delivery of conventional TNAs and combine the stable cationic poly-(lactide-co-glycolide)-graft-polyethylenimine with functionalized NANPs. Furthermore, we compare several representative NANPs to assess how their overall structures influence their delivery with the same carrier. An extensive study of various formulations both in vitro and in vivo reveals differences in their immunostimulatory activity, gene silencing efficiency, and biodistribution, with fibrous NANPs advancing for TNA delivery. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据