4.8 Article

Colloidal-ALD-Grown Core/Shell CdSe/CdS Nanoplatelets as Seen by DNP Enhanced PASS-PIETA NMR Spectroscopy

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 3003-3018

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04870

关键词

nanocrystals; nanoplatelets; c-ALD; PASS-PIETA; dynamic nuclear polarization; solid-state NMR

资金

  1. European Union through the FP7 (ERC Starting Grant NANOSOLID) [GA 306733]
  2. European Union through Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC project SCALE-HALO) [819740]
  3. ERC Advanced Grant [320860]
  4. Scholarship Fond of the Swiss Chemical Industry (SSCI Award 2015)
  5. Scholarship Fond of the Swiss Chemical Industry (SSCI Award 2017)
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [320860] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ligand exchange and CdS shell growth onto colloidal CdSe nanoplatelets (NPLs) using colloidal atomic layer deposition (c-ALD) were investigated by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, in particular, dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) enhanced phase adjusted spinning sidebands-phase incremented echo-train acquisition (PASS-PIETA). The improved sensitivity and resolution of DNP enhanced PASS-PIETA permits the identification and study of the core, shell, and surface species of CdSe and CdSe/CdS core/shell NPLs heterostructures at all stages of c-ALD. The cadmium chemical shielding was found to be proportionally dependent on the number and nature of coordinating chalcogen-based ligands. DFT calculations permitted the separation of the the Cd-111/113 chemical shielding into its different components, revealing that the varying strength of paramagnetic and spin-orbit shielding contributions are responsible for the chemical shielding trend of cadmium chalcogenides. Overall, this study points to the roughening and increased chemical disorder at the surface during the shell growth process, which is not readily captured by the conventional characterization tools such as electron microscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据