4.7 Article

Climatic vulnerabilities and ecological preferences of soil invertebrates across biomes

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 752-761

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15299

关键词

aridity; biogeography; climate change; diversity; plant diversity; soil invertebrates

资金

  1. European Union [702057]
  2. FEDER funds [AGL2017-85755-R, CGL2017-88124-R]
  3. CSIC [201740I008, LINKA20069]
  4. Fundacion Seneca from Murcia province [19896/GERM/15]
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme H2020-MSCA-IF-2016 under REA [702057]
  6. FONDECYT [1170995]
  7. IAI-CRN [3005]
  8. CONICYT [PFB-23]
  9. Millennium Scientific Initiative [P05-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unlike plants and vertebrates, the ecological preferences, and potential vulnerabilities of soil invertebrates to environmental change, remain poorly understood in terrestrial ecosystems globally. We conducted a cross-biome survey including 83 locations across six continents to advance our understanding of the ecological preferences and vulnerabilities of the diversity of dominant and functionally important soil invertebrate taxa, including nematodes, arachnids and rotifers. The diversity of invertebrates was analyzed through amplicon sequencing. Vegetation and climate drove the diversity and dominant taxa of soil invertebrates. Our results suggest that declines in forest cover and plant diversity, and reductions in plant production associated with increases in aridity, can result in reductions of the diversity of soil invertebrates in a drier and more managed world. We further developed global atlases of the diversity of these important soil invertebrates, which were cross-validated using an independent database. Our study advances the current knowledge of the ecological preferences and vulnerabilities of the diversity and presence of functionally important soil invertebrates in soils from across the globe. This information is fundamental for improving and prioritizing conservation efforts of soil genetic resources and management policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据