4.5 Article

OLR1 Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis via Increased c-Myc Expression and Transcription of HMGA2

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 685-697

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0718

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974376, 81772639, 81972258]
  2. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2016-I2M-1-001]
  3. Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2018PT32014, 2018PT32002]
  4. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Students [2017-1002-1-16]
  5. PUMC Youth Fund
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017320027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal human malignancies, partly because of its propensity for metastasis. However, the mechanisms of metastasis in pancreatic cancer remain unclear. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (OLR1), a lectin-like scavenger receptor that recognizes several ligands, such as oxidized low-density lipoprotein, was previously reported in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The role and mechanism of OLR1 in pancreatic cancer is unclear. In this study, we found that OLR1 expression was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer tissues than that in adjacent normal tissues and closely associated with reduced overall survival. OLR1 promoted proliferation and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, OLR1 increased HMGA2 transcription by upregulating c-Myc expression to promote the metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. In addition, patients with pancreatic cancer with high expression of OLR1-c-Myc-HMGA2 axis showed worse prognosis compared with patients with low expression of OLR1-c-Myc-HMGA2 axis. Implications: Our findings suggested that the OLR1-c-MycHMGA2 axis promotes metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells and may serve as potential therapeutic targets and prognosis markers for patients with pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据