4.7 Article

Evaluation of phenolic antioxidant capacity in beverages based on laccase immobilized on screen-printed carbon electrode modified with graphene nanoplatelets and gold nanoparticles

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104282

关键词

Antioxidants; Biosensors; Graphene nanoparticles; UV/Vis spectrophotometry

资金

  1. CEEPUS network [CIII-CZ-0212-12-1819-M-122538]
  2. ASEAN European Academic University Network (ASEA-UNINET) [ASEA 2019_UniGraz_1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and highly sensitive electrochemical biosensor based on laccase immobilized onto a gold nanoparticles/graphene nanoplatelets-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (LACC/AuNP/GNP1/SPCE) was developed for the determination of hydroquinone (HQ) and other phenolic compounds. The biosensor shows excellent electro-catalytic activity towards oxidation of hydroquinone at a potential of -0.05 V (vs Ag/AgCl, 3 M KCl) in phosphate buffer as supporting electrolyte (0.1 M, pH 7.0) using hydrodynamic amperometry. Analytical characteristics uncover that the LACC/AuNP/GNPI/SPCE comprises a wide linear range for the dependence of the signal on HQ concentrations from 4 to 130 mu M with a detection limit (3 sigma) of 1.5 mu M. The repeatability (5 measurements, 100 mu M hydroquinone) is +/- 2% and the reproducibility (5 biosensors, 100 mu M hydroquinone) is +/- 3%. Interference studies of most common compounds with the determination of hydroquinone demonstrated negligible effects. Finally, the biosensor and the analytical method were applied to the determination of phenolic antioxidant capacity (AOC) in wine and blueberry syrup based on Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid) and hydroquinone equivalents. The results were evaluated by using their calibration curves which were satisfactory and agreed well with the results obtained by the reference method Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity assay (TEAC-Assay).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据