4.6 Article

Synthesis of MgO/Fe3O4 nanoparticles embedded activated carbon from biomass for high-efficient adsorption of malachite green

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122240

关键词

Biomass; Magnetic activated carbon; Fe3O4/MgO composite nanoparticles; Malachite green; Adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe-Mg bimetallic magnetic activated carbons (Fe-Mg BACs) were synthesized using biomass (peanut shells) as precursor combining the activation mechanism of FeCl3 and MgCl2 to realize high adsorption performance on malachite green (MG) toxic dye. It was observed that MgO nanoparticles were formed and aggregated with the Fe3O4 during activation process under CO2 atmosphere, and then formed MgO/Fe3O4 composite nanoparticles on the surface of the carbon basal plane. A large MG adsorption capacity of 4031.96 mg/g was achieved by Fe-Mg15 (activation using 15 g of MgCl2 center dot 6H(2)O and 10 g of FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O) at 318 K. Fe-Mg15 still possessed super-paramagnetic property while the formation of MgO nanoparticles weakened the magnetic property. The best fit of the Pseudo-first-order kinetic and Freundlich isotherm models suggested that a predominant chemisorption occurred. From the thermodynamic analysis, the high affinity of the MgO active site attracted a large number of MG molecules to the solid-liquid interface, indicating that the randomness was promoted and driven by entropy. Interactions between MG dye and Fe-Mg15 including the H-bonding, pi-pi stacking and the electrostatic attraction triggered considerable adsorption performance. The dominant interaction should be the H-bonding between Mg-OH and N-containing groups in MG. Chemical regeneration method cannot achieve effective removal of adsorbed malachite green, while the adsorptive properties of Fe-Mg BACs can be well regenerated via thermal regeneration method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据