4.6 Article

Missing Sr-Nd isotopic decoupling in subduction zone: Decoding the multi-stage dehydration and melting of subducted slab in the Chinese Altai

期刊

LITHOS
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105465

关键词

Subduction zone; Fore-arc; Mantle wedge; Sr-Nd isotopic decoupling; Island arc basalt; Central Asian Orogenic Belt

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41625007, 41902056]
  2. Hong Kong RGC grants [17303415, 17302317]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some island arc basalts (IAB) show Nd-Hf isotopic decoupling, which can be attributed to higher mobility of Nd over Hf in melts released from subducted slab and subsequent metasomatism in the mantle wedge. If the same mechanism applies, Sr-Nd isotopic decoupling should be common in typical IAB, but in fact it is not the case. In order to investigate this problem, we carried out a systematic study on the Habahe mafic dykes at similar to 360Ma, which emplaced in the south margin of the Chinese Altai due to the northward subduction of the Junggar Ocean. These dykes can be subdivided into four types based on distinct geochemical compositions and spatial distribution. Type-I mafic dykes in the southern area are enriched in light rare earth elements (LREE) and Th with positive Pb anomaly. They have high initial Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.7088-0.7095), Pb-206/Pb-204 (17.971-18.034), Pb-207/Pb-204 (15.526-15.551) and Pb-208/Pb-204 (37.860-37.991) ratios and exhibit Nd-Hf isotopic decoupling with high epsilon(Hf) (t) (+9.5 - +12.1) and low epsilon(Nd)(t) values (+3.5 - +3.9). Thus Type-I mafic dykes are interpreted as originating from a depleted mantle source metasomatized by melts from subducted sediments. Type-II mafic dykes in the western segment of central area are depleted in LREE and Th but enriched in Ba, Sr and Pb. They show high positive epsilon(Nd)(t) (+6.5 - +8.1) and epsilon(Hf)(t) (+13.4 - +15.4) values with relatively low initial Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.7040-0.7049), Pb-206/Pb-204 (17.715-17.839), Pb-207/Pb-204 (15.484-15.495) and Pb-208/Pb-204 (37.739-37.797) ratios, which would be derived from the partial melting of a depleted mantle source with input of fluids from subducted sediments. Type-III mafic dykes in the eastern segment of central area are enriched in LREE with weakly positive Pb anomaly. They show low initial Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.7036-0.7038), Pb-206/Pb-204 (17.871-18.001), Pb-207/Pb-204 (15.485-15.491) and Pb-208/Pb-204 (37.610-37.642) ratios and have high positive epsilon(Nd)(t) (+6.7 - +6.9) and epsilon(Hf)(t) (+14.6 - +14.8) values, which are interpreted as products of partial melting of a depleted mantle source refertilized by melts from the subducted oceanic crust. Type-IV mafic dykes in the northern area are also enriched in LREE but show significantly positive Pb anomaly with intermediate (Sr-87/Sr-86)(i) ratios (0.7068-0.7070), low epsilon(Nd)(t) values (+0.7 - +1.0), high epsilon(Hf)(t) values (+5.5 - +7.8), and high initial Pb-206/Pb-204 (18.001-18.402), Pb-207/Pb-204 (15.522-15.553) and Pb-208/Pb-204 (38.163-38.299) ratios, thus interpreted as originating from a depleted mantle source with the involvement of melts released from subducted sediments. Type-I mafic dykes have similar Nd-Hf-Pb isotopic compositions with Type-IV mafic dykes but show higher (Sr-87/Sr-86) i ratios, indicating that the melts and fluids from subducted sediments at shallower depth possess high Sr/Nd ratios because of breakdown of plagioclase. Involvement of such melts and fluids can explain Sr-Nd isotopic decoupling for the southern mafic dykes of this study, as the modern analogue of fore-arc basalts and boninites in the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc and Western Java, which have higher Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios than those in typical IAB. Consequently, melting of the residual subducted sediments at the sub-arc depth will generate low Sr/Nd fluids and melts, which can account for the Sr-Nd isotopic coupling of the typical IAB and Type-IV mafic dykes of this study. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据