4.7 Article

How the Second Law of Thermodynamics Has Informed Ecosystem Ecology through Its History

期刊

BIOSCIENCE
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 27-39

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv166

关键词

MPP; MEPP; second law of thermodynamics; ecosystem ecology; Howard T. Odum

类别

资金

  1. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Program [1027188]
  2. National Science Foundation through the Urban Sustainability Research Coordination Network [1140070]
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3297]
  4. NSF Geobiology [EAR-1451356]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1026865, 1140077] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1140070] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Directorate For Geosciences
  10. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1238212] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Earth Sciences
  12. Directorate For Geosciences [1451356] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many attempts have been made to develop a general principle governing how systems develop and organize in ecology. We reviewed the historical developments that led to the conceptualization of several goal-oriented principles in ecosystem ecology. We focused on two prominent principles-the maximum power principle (MPP)-and the maximum entropy production principle (MEPP) and the literature that applies to both. Although these principles have conceptual overlap, we found considerable differences in their historical development, the disciplines that apply these principles, and their adoption in the literature. These principles were more similar than dissimilar, and the maximization of power in ecosystems occurs with maximum entropy production. These principles have great potential to explain how systems develop, organize, and function, but there are no widely agreed-on theoretical derivations for the MEPP and MPP, hindering their broader use in ecological research. We end with recommendations for how ecosystems-level studies may better use these principles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据