4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A stochastic Functional Model based method for random vibration based robust fault detection under variable non-measurable operating conditions with application to railway vehicle suspensions

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 466, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115006

关键词

Fault detection; Vibration based methods; Variable operating conditions; Data-driven methods; Statistical time series methods; Functional models; Railway vehicles

资金

  1. Research Committee of the University of Patras via the 'K. Karatheodori' program [56990000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The problem of random vibration based robust fault detection under variable and non-measurable Environmental and Operating Conditions (EOCs) is considered, and a novel stochastic Functional Model (FM) based method is postulated. It is a data-driven method, of the Statistical Time Series (STS) type, and aims at overcoming the well known drawbacks of available methods by achieving high detection performance while eliminating their draw-backs, such as the need for measurable EOCs, for measurement of a high number of vibration signals for proper training, for subjective judgement in selecting method parameters, and for high dimensional non-convex optimization procedures. The method is based on representing the system dynamics, under any set of EOCs, in a proper feature space, within which the healthy dynamics are represented by a proper healthy subspace constructed via a Functional Model. Fault detection is then based upon determining, at a certain risk level, whether or not the current dynamics resides within the healthy subspace. The method's assessment is achieved via simulation results with a case study pertaining to fault detection in a railway vehicle suspension under variable payload, with high detection performance, clearly exceeding that of an alternative Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based method. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据