4.7 Article

Accelerating the Digitization of Biodiversity Research Specimens through Online Public Participation

期刊

BIOSCIENCE
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 383-396

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv005

关键词

crowdsourcing; citizen science; digital humanities; digitization of biodiversity research collections; public participation in scientific research

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program [EF-1115210]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. NEON
  4. National Science Foundation [EF-1029808]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1115080] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1115210, 1029808] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  10. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1339707] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A goal of the biodiversity research community is to digitize the majority of the one billion specimens in US collections by 2020. Meeting this ambitious goal requires increased collaboration and technological innovation and broader engagement beyond the walls of universities and museums. Engaging the public in digitization promises to both serve the digitizing institutions and further the public understanding of biodiversity science. We discuss three broad areas accessible to public participants that will accelerate research progress: label and ledger transcription, georeferencing from locality descriptions, and specimen annotation from images. We illustrate each activity, compare useful tools, present best practices and standards, and identify gaps in our knowledge and areas for improvement. The field of public participation in digitization of biodiversity research specimens is in a growth phase with many emerging opportunities for scientists, educators, and the public, as well as broader communication with complementary projects in other areas (e.g., the digital humanities).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据