4.7 Article

MAPDP: A Cloud-Based Computational Platform for Immunopeptidomics Analyses

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 1873-1881

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00859

关键词

bioinformatics; cloud; immunopeptidomics; major histocompatibility complex; mass spectrometry; minor antigen

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council [NSERC 311598]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute [701564]
  3. Canadian Government through Genome Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immunopeptidome corresponds to the repertoire of peptides presented at the cell surface by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Cytotoxic T cells scan this repertoire to identify nonself antigens that can arise from tumors or infected cells. The identification of actionable antigenic targets is key to the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines, T-cell therapy, and other T-cell receptor-based biologics. The growing clinical interest for immunopeptidomics has accelerated the development of high throughput proteogenomic platforms that provide a system-level analysis of MHC-associated peptides. Improvement in sensitivity and throughput of mass spectrometers now allows the detection of a few thousands of peptides from less than 100 million cells. To manage the amount of data generated by these instruments, we have developed the MHC-associated peptide discovery platform (MAPDP), a novel open-source cloud-based computational platform for immunopeptidomic analyses. It provides convenient access from a web portal to immunopeptidomes stored in the database, filtering tools, various visualizations, annotations (e.g., IEDB, dbSNP, gnomAD), peptide-binding affinity prediction (mhcflurry, NetMHC), HLA genotyping, and the generation of personalized proteome databases. MAPDP functionalities are demonstrated here by the discovery of MHC peptides featuring new genetic variants identified in two previously published ovarian carcinoma data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据