4.5 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid proteomic profiling in nusinersen-treated patients with spinal muscular atrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 153, 期 5, 页码 650-661

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14953

关键词

antisense oligonucleotide; cerebrospinal fluid; mass spectrometry; nusinersen; proteomics; spinal muscular atrophy

资金

  1. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promising results from recent clinical trials on the approved antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen in pediatric patients with 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) still have to be confirmed in adult patients but are hindered by a lack of sensitive biomarkers that indicate an early therapeutic response. Changes in the overall neurochemical composition of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) under therapy may yield additive diagnostic and predictive information. With this prospective proof-of-concept and feasibility study, we evaluated non-targeted CSF proteomic profiles by mass spectrometry along with basic CSF parameters of 10 adult patients with SMA types 2 or 3 before and after 10 months of nusinersen therapy, in comparison with 10 age- and gender-matched controls. These data were analyzed by bioinformatics and correlated with clinical outcomes assessed by the Hammersmith Functional Rating Scale Expanded (HFMSE). CSF proteomic profiles of SMA patients differed from controls. Two groups of SMA patients were identified based on unsupervised clustering. These groups differed in age and expression of proteins related to neurodegeneration and neuroregeneration. Intraindividual CSF differences in response to nusinersen treatment varied between patients who clinically improved and those who did not. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD016757. Comparative CSF proteomic analysis in adult SMA patients before and after treatment with nusinersen-identified subgroups and treatment-related changes and may therefore be suitable for diagnostic and predictive analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据