4.7 Article

The comparison between vibration and aeration on the membrane performance in algae harvesting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 592, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117390

关键词

Membrane fouling; Algae harvesting; Vibration membrane; Aeration membrane; XDLVO

资金

  1. National Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07101-006]
  2. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019BEE028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling is a main problem in algae harvesting and retarding membrane fouling is significant to increase filtration efficiency and reduce harvesting cost. The aeration membrane system could mitigate membrane fouling by the coarse bubbles and the vibration membrane system could produce high shear by the vibration of membrane to mitigate fouling. In the critical flux experiment, the aeration membrane had a low critical flux of 34 L/(m(2)h) compared with the vibration membrane (49 L/(m(2)h)). After experiencing 12-h continuous filtration, the flux decline rates of vibration and aeration membrane were 3.6% and 46%, respectively. Based on the Extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (XDLVO) theory, the free energy of fouled vibration and aeration membranes were -53.76 and -62.51 mJ/m(2), respectively, indicating that vibration could better reduce the interaction of algae cells and membrane, compared with aeration. Moreover, vibration also had a better effect on the rejection of extracellular organic matter (EOM), which could reduce secondary pollution of the water body. The different working mechanism of vibration and aeration acting on membrane was draw, suggesting that the fluid velocity induced by vibration mainly acting on membrane surface could decrease membrane fouling, while the fluid velocity induced by aeration basically could not act on membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据