4.6 Article

Effect of subatmospheric pressures on weld formation and mechanical properties during disk laser welding of 5A06 aluminium alloy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116457

关键词

Laser welding under subatmospheric pressures; 5A06 aluminium alloy; Weld formation; Microstructure characteristics; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1102100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675129]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [GX17A001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser welding under subatmospheric pressures exhibits significant potential in the field of large-scale structure connections. In this study, a set of disk laser welding experiments are performed on 35-mm-thick 5A06 aluminium alloy under various ambient pressures. The influence of ambient pressures on weld formation, plasma plume behaviours, microstructures, as well as the mechanical properties is investigated. The experimental results show that the penetration depth increased sharply when welded under the ambient pressure of 10(4) Pa, while the plasma plume and porosity defects were suppressed effectively. With further decrease in ambient pressures, there was little variation in weld characteristics. The microstructure characteristics of joints produced under subatmospheric pressures exhibited more uniformity with a wider heat-affected-zone, and the joints' mechanical properties improved markedly compared with those produced under atmospheric pressure. To obtain a high weld quality, by considering the weld appearance, porosity defects as well as welding stability, the ambient pressures for the laser welding process should be limited to less than 10(2) Pa. Apart from these, with the decrease in ambient pressures, a smaller burning loss of the element Mg as well as greater low-angle grain boundaries and dislocations would be present in the weld seam. This contributes to improvements in the mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据