4.7 Article

The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 311-319

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.021

关键词

3D printer; Particle emission; ABS; PLA; Pre-heating; Particle emission reduction

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation for youth of Jiangsu Province and China [BK20150328, 51508362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple studies have been dedicated to particle emissions from three dimensional printer (3D printer). They collectively have shown that 3D printers will emit significant ultrafine particles during their printing processes. An important step forward is to investigate the printing process in detail and help reducing emissions. This study investigates particle emissions from two filaments of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA) according to four steps (loading, heating, printing, and unloading) during the 3D printing process in constraint of product quality assessment. The results show that ABS filament triggers at least times higher particle emissions than PLA filament (ABS-printed product presents higher quality with higher nozzle temperature (240 degrees C); however, higher nozzle temperature triggers substantially higher particle emission. This study further identifies that the particle emissions are mostly triggered by the heating process rather than the printing process. It indicates that filament undergoes decomposition during the heating period after being loading into the extruder. As for product quality in terms of surface roughness and production deformation, ABS is not compatible to fast neither printing speed nor low nozzle temperature; the PLA filament exhibits significant tolerance to temperature and feed rate changes. An optimization, which is externally heating up both the extruder and platform before the filament is loaded, shows that pre-heating reduces particle emissions by 75% for ;ABS filament when compared with the conventional procedure. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据