4.2 Article

Diversity loss and changes in saproxylic beetle assemblages following a high-severity fire in Araucaria-Nothofagus forests

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 585-601

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-020-00223-5

关键词

Fire-response; Trophic guilds; Species richness; Community changes; Chile

资金

  1. CONICYT [21171980]
  2. FONDAP center [15150003, 15110009]
  3. FONDECYT [1190529, 1181300, 1171400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forest fires have increased in frequency worldwide due to global warming, drought, and land-use change. These fire-regime changes have altered the dynamics of deadwood accumulation in forests, which can affect biological communities dependent on this resource. We analyzed the effect of high-severity fire events on saproxylic beetle assemblages, which specialize in using deadwood that accumulates after disturbances. We compared assemblages in sites severely burned in 2002 to those in unburned sites in Chilean Araucaria-Nothofagus forests. Insects were collected using window-interception traps from spring 2017 to summer 2018. Rarefaction-interpolation curves revealed a significant decrease in diversity as a result of fire. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant effect of fire on insect community structure. In addition, we observed that species turnover contributing most, and nestedness to a lesser extent, to differences in ss-diversity between burned and unburned sites. Species replacement was associated with an increase in abundance of xylophagous (deadwood feeders) and a decrease in abundance of mycophagous (fungivorous) insects with fire. Therefore, our results suggest that fire causes a reduction in diversity while benefiting the abundance of xylophagous beetles in Araucaria-Nothofagus forests. We recommend the use of these insects as an evaluation tool in conservation planning, management practices, and ecological restoration efforts in burned forests in southern Chile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据