Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

(2016) Matthew J. Page et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement

(2016) Seon-Young Lee et al.   JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions

(2015) Sam Adie et al.   ANNALS OF SURGERY

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

(2015) L. Shamseer et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

(2015) L. Shamseer et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature

(2014) Paul Klimo et al.   JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY

The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: A systematic review

(2014) Wei Keith Tan et al.   International Journal of Surgery

Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review

(2014) A. Stevens et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature

(2013) Joel J. Gagnier et al.   JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME

Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

(2013) Nikola Panic et al.   PLoS One

Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?

(2013) Adam S. Tunis et al.   RADIOLOGY

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

(2009) Beverley J. Shea et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY