4.4 Article

How different rearing temperatures affect growth and stress status of Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii larvae

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 96, 期 4, 页码 913-924

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14280

关键词

Acipenser baerii larvae; gene expression; muscle development; stress; temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental temperature is one of the critical factors affecting fish development. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of three different rearing temperatures (16, 19 and 22 degrees C) throughout the endogenous feeding phase of the Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii. This was performed by assessing (a) larval survival and growth; (b) immunofluorescence localization and expression of genes involved in muscle development and growth - myog and Igf1; and (c) stress status through the expression of thermal stress genes - Hsp70, Hsp90 alpha and Hsp90 beta - and whole body cortisol. Overall survival rate and larval weight did not differ significantly across temperatures. Larvae subjected to 22 degrees C showed faster absorption of the yolk-sac than larvae subjected to 19 or 16 degrees C. Both at schooling and at the end of the trial, larvae reared at 16 degrees C showed significantly lower levels of cortisol than those reared at 19 or 22 degrees C. IGF-1 immunopositivity was particularly evident in red muscle at schooling stage in all temperatures. The expression of all Hsps as well as the myog and Igf1 genes was statistically higher in larvae reared at 16 degrees C but limited to the schooling stage. Cortisol levels were higher in larvae at 22 degrees C, probably because of the higher metabolism demand rather than a stress response. The observed apparent incongruity between Hsps gene expression and cortisol levels could be due to the lack of a mature system. Further studies are necessary, especially regarding the exogenous feeding phase, in order to better understand if this species is actually sensitive to thermal stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据