期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 201-205出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001
关键词
Peer-review; Reviewers; Reviewer fatigue; Rewards; Scientific publication; Scholarly journals
资金
- Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil)
Background and Objectives: Reviewer refusal is a phenomenon associated with different causes, including reviewer fatigue, lack of time, dissatisfaction with the editorial system, among other reasons. This article discusses the main factors involved in the reviewer refusal and the peer-review crisisfrom a broad perspective. In addition, reasons that make a researcher accept or not a review invitation are also described. Methods: This article is a narrative review. Results: This article provides some alternatives that can help in the reversal of peer-review crisis and decrease high reviewer refusal rates, and which may also engage experienced reviewers in the peer-review process. Conclusion: Carefully selecting reviewers, publicly acknowledging them, and offering nonmonetary rewards appear to be good strategies for engaging reviewers. In addition, highly productive reviewers should be recognized by the journals. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据