4.7 Review

A comprehensive review on toxic petrochemical wastewater pretreatment and advanced treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118692

关键词

Petrochemical wastewater; Specific organic pollutants; Pretreatment; Advanced treatment; Bioenergy recovery

资金

  1. National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project of China [2017ZX07402002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Petrochemical wastewater is a major industrial source of pollution that produces a variety of refractory and toxic organic pollutants that are detrimental to animals and plants in natural water bodies; it is especially harmful to biological treatment systems. Regardless of these threats, studies on these specific organic pollutants are limited at present. Consequently, it is extremely essential to promote relevant problem solving efficiently. Currently, only limited processes are available for pretreatment of high-concentration wastewater, and advanced treatment of secondary effluent as compared to the conventional treatment are introduced by current studies. Therefore, in this review, we have systematically generalized the characteristics of petrochemical wastewater; we have particularly summarized and compared different methods (recent developments, influencing factors, etc.) which are applied in pretreatment and advancement of current methods. Additionally, the interaction mechanisms of microbes under a wide range of concentrations of specific organic pollutants and associated degradation pathways have been described comprehensively. Moreover, we have analyzed bioenergy recovery from the degradation/removal of specific organic pollutants with environmental-friendly and economically methods because it can help realize the goal of circular resource utilization during the process of detoxification and minimization. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据