4.7 Article

Extension of the Cheap Composite Approach to Noncovalent Interactions: The jun-ChS Scheme

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 988-1006

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01037

关键词

-

资金

  1. MIUR PRIN 2015 funds [2015F59J3R]
  2. University of Bologna (RFO funds)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new variant of the so-called cheap composite scheme has been purposely developed for the evaluation of the interaction energy of noncovalent molecular complexes, with its various contributions being tested for a set of 15 systems using the accurate interaction energies reported as reference values in the following: [Rezac, J. et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 19268-19277]. The modified scheme, starting from the CCSD(T) method in conjunction with a triple-zeta-quality basis set augmented by diffuse functions, includes two additional terms computed at the MP2 level: (i) the extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit and (ii) the contribution of core-valence correlation effects (CV term). Various families of basis sets including diffuse functions have been tested for the CCSD(T) model as well as for the extrapolation to the CBS limit, with a mean absolute error of about 1% (below 0.2 kJ.mol(-1) in absolute terms) obtained with the jun-cc-pVnZ and the jul-cc-pVnZ families. As far as the CV term is concerned, the cc-pCVTZ and cc-pwCVTZ basis sets provide comparable contributions, which are non-negligible in several cases. While the benchmark analysis has been carried out using accurate structures available in the literature, geometrical effects due to the use of reference B2PLYP(-D3BJ) geometries, optimized in conjunction with a triple-zeta-quality basis set, have been investigated, thus pointing out their suitability. Finally, the modified scheme has been applied to a number of test cases for which interaction energies were already available in the literature; among these, a number of molecular complexes bearing second-row atoms have been considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据