4.7 Article

Electrical conductivity, ion pairing, and ion self-diffusion in aqueous NaCl solutions at elevated temperatures and pressures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 151, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5128671

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Los Alamos National Laboratory [20190057DR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of aqueous sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions from 298 to 674 K at 200 bars to understand the influence of ion pairing and ion self-diffusion on electrical conductivity in high-temperature/high-pressure salt solutions. Conductivity data obtained from the MD simulation highlight an apparent anomaly, namely, a conductivity maximum as temperature increases along an isobar, which has been also observed in experimental studies. By examining both velocity autocorrelation and cross-correlation terms of the Green-Kubo integral, we quantitatively demonstrate that the conductivity anomaly arises mainly from a competition between the single-ion self-diffusion and the contact ion pair formation. The velocity autocorrelation function in conjunction with structural analysis suggests that diffusive motion of ions is suppressed at high temperatures due to the persistence of an inner hydration shell. The contribution of velocity cross-correlation functions between oppositely charged ions becomes significant at the onset of the conductivity decrease. Structural analysis based on Voronoi tessellation and pair correlation functions indicates that the fraction of contact ion pairs increases as temperature increases. Spatial decomposition of the electrical conductivity also indicates that the formation of contact ion pairs significantly decreases the electrical conductivity compared to Nernst-Einstein conductivity, but the contribution of distant opposite charges cannot be ignored except at the highest temperature due to unscreened long-range interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据