4.7 Article

Ag doping to boost the electrochemical performance and corrosion resistance of Ti/Sn-Sb-RuOx/α-PbO2/β-PbO2 electrode in zinc electrowinning

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 815, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152551

关键词

Ag doping; beta-PbO2 composite anode; Electrocatalytic activity; Corrosion resistance; Zinc electrowinning

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51564029, 51504111, 51874154]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633418]
  3. Technology Innovation Talents Project of Yunnan Province [2019HB111]
  4. Applied Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province [2019FD066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag doped beta-PbO2 anode material was prepared on Ti/Sn-Sb-RuOx/alpha-PbO2 through electrodeposition technique to improve its electrochemical properties and corrosion resistance in zinc electrowinning. The chemical composition and surface morphology of the anodes were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Xray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The electrochemical properties and corrosion resistance of the anode materials were established via linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and accelerated life tests. Results showed that the grain size of beta-PbO2 increased with AgNO3 concentration while Ag+ was oxidized to Ago and adsorbed on the electrode surface to accelerate the growth of beta-PbO2 grains. We also proposed the nucleation/deposition mechanism of beta-PbO2 electrode while verifying the role of Ag ion doping. The optimum electrocatalytic performance could be achieved when the concentration of AgNO3 was 6 g L-1. Compared with that of the undoped pure beta-PbO2 anode, the oxygen evolution potential of the Ti/Sn-Sb-RuOx/alpha PbO2/Ag-F-beta-PbO2 was decreased by 64 mV. The service life of the doped F-Ag-beta-PbO2 anode could reach up as high as 249 h, which was 1.66 times of pure beta-PbO2 anode. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据