4.7 Article

Improving the electrochemical performance of Na3V2O2(PO4)2F cathode by using a defect-containing TiO2-x coating for sodium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 814, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152270

关键词

Oxygen-deficient; Cathode; Sodium-ion batteries; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21701079]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Doctors Scholar [ZR2017BB016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na3V2O2(PO4)(2)F (denoted as NVOPF) is one of the most promising cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries because of its three-dimensional NASICON structure and high reversible capacity. However, the sluggish sodium-ion diffusion and poor electronic conductivity of NVOPF still hinder their practical application. The oxygen vacancies on the surface of anode materials could promote their charge-transfer kinetics. So far, there are many reports about metal oxide coating to improve the performance of the cathode material. However, it has rarely been reported that the performance of the cathode material is improved by coating with an oxygen-deficient metal oxide. Herein, in this paper, we have successfully synthesized the oxygen-deficient titanium dioxide coated Na3V2O2(PO4)(2)F (denoted as NVOPF@TiO2-x) nanosheets by a simple hydrothermal method combined with a high temperature calcination in Ar/H-2. As a cathode for a sodium-ion half-cell, the NVOPF@TiO2-x delivers excellent cycling stability and rate capability. A reversible capacity of 105 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C after 100 charge-discharge cycles and 54 mAh g(-1) at 1 C can be achieved after 500 cycles. The prominent electrochemical properties should be attributed to the effective diffusion of ion and improved transportation of electron in the TiO2-x layer, which is due to the enhanced donor density and number of active sites resulting from the formation of oxygen vacancies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据