4.7 Article

New nanoparticles for topical ocular delivery of erythropoietin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119020

关键词

Erythropoietin; Chitosan; Hyaluronic acid; Nanoparticles; Ophthalmology; Ex vivo model

资金

  1. FCT fellowship [SFRH/BD/130476/2017]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [UID/DTP/04138/2013, UID/CVT/276/2013]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/130476/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erythropoietin (EPO) is known for its neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties. EPO topical ocular administration has not been tested yet and its bioavailability could be improved by mucoadhesive hydrogels. Thus, this study aimed to develop and evaluate a chitosan (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) nanoparticulate system for topical ocular delivery of EPO. Nanoparticles were prepared by ionotropic gelation using six different HAs (HAI -HA6), and characterized by size, zeta potential (ZP), polydispersity index (Pdi), cytotoxicity and mucoadhesion. Encapsulation efficiency and drug loading capacity were also determined. Ex vivo permeation was tested using fresh porcine corneas, scleras and conjunctivas. The permeated EPO was quantified by ELISA, and its presence in the membranes was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Nanoparticles (NPs) presented size <= 300 nm, ZP around + 30 mV and low Pdi (0.167-0.539) at a 1:1 CS:HA mass ratio. The most suitable HA was HA6 (300 kDa - Eye), which had the best mucoadhesive properties. CS/HA6-EPO nanoformulation permeated more rapidly through porcine conjunctiva, followed by sclera and thirdly by cornea, as assessed by immunohistochemistry. All formulations were noncytotoxic on ARPE-19 and HaCaT cell lines, as evaluated by metabolic and membrane integrity tests. In conclusion, CS/HA6-EPO NPs could be a promising formulation for increasing EPO ocular bioavailability by enhancing its retention time and permeation through the different ocular membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据