4.7 Article

Thermal analysis and machinability for laser-assisted machining of fused silica

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119078

关键词

Fused silica; Laser-assisted machining; Thermal analysis; Machinability; Tool wear

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2016ZX04002007]
  2. 13th Five Year Plan Equipment Pre-Research Common Technical Project [41423060208]
  3. National Defense Basic Scientific Research program of China [JCKY201803203C041]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51627807, 51705172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machining of fused silica to obtain high precision dimension and surface property has been an industry wide problem. In this study, laser-assisted machining (LAM) of fused silica has been introduced with three-dimensional thermal models been built to perform detailed analysis. The accuracy of the model is validated by measuring the temperature of workpiece and poly crystalline diamond (PCD) tool. The appropriate combination of machining parameters has been analyzed, as well as the temperature distribution at material removal layer, cutting zone of workpiece and PCD tool. A uniform temperature distribution is obtained at workpiece surface, with a very small temperature gradient of 20 K at the radial depth range of 100 mu m after preheating. Although the temperature at cutting zone of workpiece is 1490 K, it is much lower at nose of tool with a value of 510 K, which is contrary with common belief. In addition, the experiments under higher temperature in LAM and lower temperature in conventional machining (CM) are carried out to study the machinability with respect to subsurface damage, chip morphology and tool wear. The results indicate that the machinability in LAM of fused silica is greatly improved, attributed to the maintenance of excellent performance of the PCD tool, and along with the changes in hardness, strength and viscoplasticity of fused silica. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据