4.3 Article

Factors impacting injury severity of crashes involving traffic barrier end treatments

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 202-210

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1701878

关键词

Crash data analysis; traffic barrier; end treatment; injury severity; random-parameters ordered logit

资金

  1. Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) [RS03218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify variables affecting the severity of crashes involving traffic barrier end treatments. The research found that end treatment crashes involving different types of end treatment structures have varying levels of injury severity, with some types being less likely to result in severe injuries. Additionally, the location and type of end treatments, as well as the type of vehicles involved, also play a role in the severity of the crashes.
This paper seeks to identify variables affecting the severity of crashes involving traffic barrier end treatments. A field inventory was conducted to collect type, system height (from the ground to the top), lateral offset (from the edge of pavement), and side-slope of over 11,000 end treatments in the state of Wyoming. Then, the data collected was combined with historical end treatment crashes using the Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) software. Finally, a severity model was developed for end treatment crashes, considering a random-parameters ordered logit model. Among the end treatment types considered in this study, the end anchorage type A-FLEAT 350 was least likely to result in severe injuries in crashes. On the other hand, turned-down end terminal and the end anchorage WY-BET were involved with higher injury severity in crashes. End treatments located on a flat roadside were found to be less severe, showing a parameter estimate equal to -1.10 in the crash severity model. End treatment crashes involving pickup also had a lower probability of causing a severe injury crash compared to the other vehicle types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据