4.3 Article

Study and Restoration of the Yi Ma Wu Hui Layer of the Ancient Coating on the Putuo Zongcheng Temple

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 1707-1721

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1719232

关键词

Ancient architecture; coating; restoration; tung oil; YMWH layer

资金

  1. National Cultural Heritage Administration of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that the Putuo Zongcheng Temple used nonblood YMWH technical processes in its ancient coatings. By comparing the components of the YMWH layer with commercial restoration materials and confirming their similarities, a successful restoration of the ancient coating was achieved. This research may enhance the understanding and application of traditional coating techniques in the preservation of ancient cultural architecture.
The Putuo Zongcheng Temple was built over two hundred years ago. The ancient coating on its wooden structures has been seriously damaged and needs restoration. To restore the original structure, the YMWH (Yi Ma Wu Hui) layer of the ancient coating in the Putuo Zongcheng Temple is separated and characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). At the same time, the components of the YMWH layer are compared with the commercial materials used for restoration. The analysis and comparison indicate that nonblood YMWH technical processes were used in the Putuo Zongcheng Temple. The similarity between ancient materials and commercial restoration materials is confirmed. On this basis, the restoration of the ancient coating is successfully completed. This research on the YMWH layer in ancient coatings will probably improve the understanding and application of traditional coating techniques in the preservation of ancient cultural architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据