4.6 Review

Education to improve quality of life of people with chronic inflammatory skin conditions: a systematic review of the evidence

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 174, 期 6, 页码 1228-1241

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14435

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme [13/11/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patient and carer education has been proposed as a way of improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among people with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of education that specifically addresses HRQoL among people with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. We searched 12 literature databases and other sources (up to July 2014). Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the review inclusion criteria. Data from these RCTs were extracted and critically appraised. Two RCTs showed that for psoriasis in adults, group-based and text message education (as adjuncts to usual care) resulted in better HRQoL and disease severity outcomes than comparators, respectively. One RCT found that group-based education for children with eczema (atopic dermatitis) and their parents resulted in greater improvements in parents' HRQoL and in the children's disease severity than no education at 12 months. The remaining RCTs evaluated an educational session for psoriasis, a website for carers of children with eczema, information on skincare and makeup use given to women with acne, and an itch-coping programme for a range of conditions, all as adjuncts to usual care. None of these RCTs found statistically significant effects on HRQoL or disease severity compared with usual care. Common features of the effective interventions were long delivery (over 6 weeks to 3 months) and delivery by a multidisciplinary team. Overall, the evidence base is currently limited and generally has an unclear risk of bias. There is a need for more large RCTs evaluating piloted and theory-based interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency

Jonathan Shepherd, Geoff K. Frampton, Karen Pickett, Jeremy C. Wyatt

PLOS ONE (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Ecological Recovery and Resilience in Environmental Risk Assessments at the European Food Safety Authority

Theo Brock, Franz Bigler, Geoff Frampton, Christer Hogstrand, Robert Luttik, Fabrice Martin-Laurent, Christopher John Topping, Wopke van der Werf, Agnes Rortais

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Improving Uptake of Postnatal Checking of Blood Glucose in Women Who Had Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Universal Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review

Helen Sanderson, Emma Loveman, Jill Colquitt, Pamela Royle, Norman Waugh, Bee Kang Tan

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2019)

Article Orthopedics

Allografts in reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective

Norman Waugh, Hema Mistry, Andrew Metcalfe, Jill Colquitt, Emma Loveman, Pamela Royle, Nick A. Smith

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2019)

Article Orthopedics

Meniscal allograft transplantation after meniscectomy: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

Norman Waugh, Hema Mistry, Andrew Metcalfe, Emma Loveman, Jill Colquitt, Pamela Royle, Nick A. Smith, Tim Spalding

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Choice of Methodology Impacts Outcome in Indirect Comparisons of Drugs for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

David A. Scott, Emma Loveman, Jill L. Colquitt, Katherine O'Reilly

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA (2019)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map

Geoff K. Frampton, Jonathan Shepherd, Karen Pickett, Gareth Griffiths, Jeremy C. Wyatt

TRIALS (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers

Ko Konno, Samantha H. Cheng, Jacqualyn Eales, Geoff Frampton, Christian Kohl, Barbara Livoreil, Biljana Macura, Bethan C. O'Leary, Nicola P. Randall, Jessica J. Taylor, Paul Woodcock, Andrew S. Pullin

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY (2020)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review

B. Nussbaumer-Streit, M. Ellen, I Klerings, R. Sfetcu, N. Riva, M. Mahmic-Kaknjo, G. Poulentzas, P. Martinez, E. Baladia, L. E. Ziganshina, M. E. Marques, L. Aguilar, A. P. Kassianos, G. Frampton, A. G. Silva, L. Affengruber, R. Spjker, J. Thomas, R. C. Berg, M. Kontogiani, M. Sousa, C. Kontogiorgis, G. Gartlehner

Summary: The study aimed to investigate the resource use and reasons for resource intensity during systematic review production. Project management and administration, study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal were found to be the areas with the largest resource use.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice

Geoff Frampton, Lois Woods, David Alexander Scott

Summary: The retraction process of Covid-19 research articles is inconsistent and ambiguous, with more than half of retracted articles remaining available from a wide range of online sources. There is an urgent need to improve guidance on the retraction process and to extend this to cover preprint servers.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews

Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, Gary Bilotta, Jean-Lou C. M. Dorne, Jacqualyn Eales, Katy James, Christian Kohl, Magnus Land, Barbara Livoreil, David Makowski, Evans Muchiri, Gillian Petrokofsky, Nicola Randall, Kate Schofield

Summary: This paper addresses the deficiencies in risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews by highlighting core principles and presenting a framework to guide review teams. The core principles require that risk of bias assessments be Focused, Extensive, Applied and Transparent (FEAT).

ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE (2022)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

Standards of conduct and reporting in evidence syntheses that could inform environmental policy and management decisions

Andrew S. Pullin, Samantha H. Cheng, Josephine D'Urban Jackson, Jacqualyn Eales, Ida Envall, Salamatu J. Fada, Geoff K. Frampton, Meagan Harper, Andrew N. Kadykalo, Christian Kohl, Ko Konno, Barbara Livoreil, Dakis-Yaoba Ouedraogo, Bethan C. O'Leary, George Pullin, Nicola Randall, Rebecca Rees, Adrienne Smith, Romain Sordello, Eleanor J. Sterling, Will M. Twardek, Paul Woodcock

Summary: Accurate, unbiased and concise synthesis of available evidence is crucial for effective environmental policy and management decisions. However, most recently published evidence syntheses lack reliability and transparency, with only those following guidance and standards achieving higher assessment ratings. Improvement in evaluation criteria and reporting standards is needed to enhance the quality of environmental evidence syntheses.

ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE (2022)

Article Respiratory System

Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve symptom control, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in interstitial lung disease: an evidence synthesis

Sabrina Bajwah, Jill Colquitt, Emma Loveman, Claudia Bausewein, Howard Almond, Adejoke Oluyase, Mendy Dzingina, Matthew Maddocks, Irene J. Higginson, Athol Wells

Summary: This study evaluated the efficacy and effectiveness of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions in improving symptom control, functional exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. The results showed that pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise training had a short-term effect on improving 6-minute walk distance, but not in the long term. Dyspnoea was the most researched symptom, while cough was the least researched symptom, indicating a need for further research and intervention focus on neglected symptoms.

ERJ OPEN RESEARCH (2021)

暂无数据