4.6 Article

New Approach with Universal Applicability for Evaluating the Heat Requirements in the Solvent Regeneration Process for Postcombustion CO2 Capture

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 3261-3268

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05247

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506179, 21506181, 21776065, 21802115]
  2. Hunan province science and technology plan [2018SK2027, 2018RS3088, 2019SK2112, 2017XK2048, 2019JJ20006, 2017TP2026, 2018JJ3501]
  3. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province [17B255, 17B256]
  4. Research Start-up Foundation of Xiangtan University [19QDZ05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzylamine (BZA), biodegradable with bacteria, has advantages over monoethanolamine (MEA) in terms of corrosiveness, resistance to oxidative degradation, viscosity, mass transfer, and energy consumption for CO2 capture. The current work examined the CO2 absorption-desorption performances of three BZA-based solvents to improve the amine scrubbing process with significant reduction of the energy consumption especially during the solvent regeneration. The experimental results approved that BZA-1DMA2P reduces the energy cost, increases the cyclic capacity, and increases the CO2 desorption rate by 55.3, 478.8, and 189.2% compared to MEA, respectively. Based on the discoveries from the designed experiments, an evaluation parameter of energy-operation-window was proposed to quantitatively describe the flexibility and capability of CO2 extraction from a CO2-rich solution with a certain amount of energy. A combined desorption parameter (DP) was also developed to evaluate the energy performance of an amine solvent. The universal applicability of DP was validated with a series of data extracted from literature studies with different amine systems with and without catalysts. All these results confirmed that DP could be an efficient parameter to predict the energy efficiency of a solvent for a fast screening process without directly measuring the heat cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据