4.8 Article

A Two-Step Strategy for Online Fault Detection of High-Resistance Connection in BLDC Motor

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 3043-3053

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2929102

关键词

Circuit faults; Fault detection; Permanent magnet motors; Stator windings; Brushless DC motors; Traction motors; Brushless direct current motor (BLDCM); high-resistance connection (HRC); online fault detection; zero sequence voltage component (ZSVC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51605002, 51637001, 51675001]
  2. Open Project Program of the Traction Power State Key Laboratory of the Southwest Jiaotong University [TPL1905]
  3. Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions of the Chongqing University [SKLMT-KFKT-201812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resistance connection (HRC) is one of the common stator faults in motors. The HRC fault detection method for brushless direct current motors (BLDCMs) has not been reported yet. This study proposes a two-step strategy for the detection, localization, and evaluation of HRC fault in a BLDCM. In the first step, the zero sequence voltage component (ZSVC) of the motor is acquired and analyzed, and the HRC fault can be detected from the amplitude of the fundamental frequency component of the ZSVC spectrum. In the second step, once the HRC fault has been detected, three indicators are calculated from the ZSVC and three-phase currents to localize the fault phase. The resistance value of the HRC is then calculated. Theoretical, simulated, and experimental analyses have been performed, and the results of them are consistent with one another, thereby validating the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Both the HRC fault detection algorithm and the motor control algorithm are implemented on a single microcontroller unit in real time, which makes the proposed strategy efficient and flexible in industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据