4.7 Article

Importance of Early Diagnosis in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 91-97

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13291

关键词

cardiomyopathies; healthcare disparities; preeclampsia; pregnancy; women

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) CTSA SPIRIT award
  2. National Institutes of Health [K12HD085848, R01HL126797]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) can lead to long-term systolic dysfunction, especially among black women. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the strongest risk factor for PPCM, but controversy remains on whether HDP predict a favorable outcome. Women with HDP are also often diagnosed with PPCM earlier than those without HDP. Our objective is to determine recovery of systolic function in patients with PPCM stratified by HDP, timing of diagnosis, and race. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 220 patients (55% black) diagnosed with PPCM. Patients with PPCM and HDP were diagnosed earlier postpartum than patients without HDP (P=0.013), an effect that was most pronounced in nonblack patients. Rates of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery were similar among PPCM patients with and without HDP (68.4% versus 62.6%, P=0.425). In contrast, patients with PPCM diagnosed after 1-month postpartum had lower rates of LVEF recovery than patients diagnosed <1-month postpartum (53.7% versus 69.9%, P=0.035). LVEF at time of diagnosis is a strong predictor of LVEF recovery, and patients with PPCM diagnosed after 1-month postpartum had lower baseline LVEF compared to patients presenting earlier (P=0.041). The presence of HDP does not correlate with LVEF recovery in our racially diverse PPCM cohort. In contrast, early diagnosis portends a favorable outcome. Early diagnosis is associated with higher LVEF at presentation, likely explaining the improved outcomes in these women. These findings underscore the need for early monitoring and diagnosis, especially in at-risk and underserved populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据